Systems and Methods for Genotyping by Angle Configuration Search

ABSTRACT

Methods and systems for the analysis of genotyping data are presented. According to various embodiments of methods and systems, an angle configuration search may be performed. In various embodiments, an exhaustive search over the entirety of an angle configuration space may be performed to provide a fit to a plurality of angles determined for a plurality of points in a data set generated from a plurality of biological samples. For various embodiments, the angle configuration space may be defined to ensure that a global fit may be determined. According to various methods and systems, a data base of possible angle configurations may be searched, in which each angle configuration may include three angles. According to various methods and systems, a data base of possible angle configurations may include for each angle configuration a probability that the angle configuration may occur.

BACKGROUND

Genotyping assays configured as a duplex reaction is well known in theart. In such a duplex reaction, two dyes having emissions at differentwavelengths can be associated with each of a probe directed to one oftwo alleles of a target diploid genomic locus in a biological sample. Insuch duplex reactions, a discrete set of signals for each of threepossible genotypes is produced by combinations of a first dye signal(signal 1) and a second dye signal (signal 2), which yield threediscrete sets of signals given as (signal 1, signal 1), (signal 1,signal 2), and (signal 2, signal 2). Such signals may be collected as adata set that may include a plurality of data points, where each datapoint corresponds to one of the three discrete sets of signals for eachsample in a plurality of samples. Such a data set of data points may bestored in a variety of computer readable media, and may be analyzedeither dynamically during analysis or post analysis.

In that regard, the three discrete sets of signals that may be producedfor each of three possible genotypes may be displayed in a Cartesiancoordinate plot. The axes of such a plot may be displayed as a first dyesignal versus a second dye signal, where each discrete set of signalsfor each sample may be represented as a data point in such a plot. Then,for a plurality of samples representative of a diploid genome, anywherefrom 1-3 clusters of points may occur in such a Cartesian coordinateplot. Often, in such approaches, an angle in the Cartesian plot for eachdata point is determined, so that the data may be expressed in anangular format. Such data has typically been analyzed in the art byusing cluster analysis to define discrete clusters, and assign agenotype based on cluster fit alone.

Such approaches may fail to accurately assign a genotype to a sample fora variety of reasons. First, the angle configuration of the three anglesfor a variety of genotype assays may be significantly different andadditionally, the angle configuration may vary from run-to-run for anyparticular genotype assay. In that regard, the angle information aloneis not sufficient to assign a genotype. Second, for a plurality ofbiological samples analyzed, it is possible to have the data clusteredin only one or two clusters. For data in which all three clusters arepresent, a fit to a model may be more easily achieved, as the anglespace is bounded by three possible solutions. However, for data setsobtained from a plurality of biological samples in which only one or twoclusters occur, a fit to a model may be more difficult, resulting inincorrect genotype calls to be made for at least some samples. Forexample, a final call in such data sets may depend on the angle of acontrol sample. In that regard, if the control sample is contaminated,for example, or in any way falsely identified with an incorrect cluster,erroneous calls will be made for every member of that cluster.

There is a need in the art for a robust analysis of genotype data, inwhich the optimization is well-defined, and yields a suitable confidencein a final result of assignment of genotype for samples in data sets,where the data sets may be represented by a finite number of clusters ofdata points based on the ploidy state of the genome of an organism.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flow chart that depicts various embodiments of methods forthe analysis of genotyping data.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart that depicts various embodiments of methods forthe pre-data analysis processing of genotyping data.

FIG. 3 is an exemplary representation of the assignment of an angle toclusters of data, according to various embodiments of methods for theanalysis of genotyping data.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a PCR instrument that may be utilized toprocess samples analyzed for genotype.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a PCR instrument that may be utilized toprocess samples analyzed for genotype.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram that illustrates components of an exemplarycomputer system that may be utilized in the control and interface of PCRinstrumentation.

FIGS. 7A-7C are graphical representations of angle configurations thatmay be a subset of angle configurations according to various embodimentsof a data base of angle configuration that are possible for genotypingdata.

FIGS. 8A-8C are graphical representations of various embodiments ofmethods for the analysis of genotyping data.

FIGS. 9A-9C are graphical representations of various embodiments ofmethods for the analysis of genotyping data.

FIGS. 10A-10C are graphical representations of the fit of an exemplarytwo-cluster data set according to various embodiments of methods for theanalysis of genotyping data.

FIGS. 11A-11C are graphical representations of the fit of an exemplaryone-cluster data set according to various embodiments of methods for theanalysis of genotyping data.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present teachings relate to embodiments of methods and systems forthe analysis of genotyping data. According to various embodiments ofmethods and systems, an angle configuration search may be performed. Invarious embodiments, an exhaustive search over the entirety of an angleconfiguration space may be performed to provide a fit to a plurality ofangles determined for a plurality of data points in a data set generatedfrom a plurality of biological samples. For various embodiments, theangle configuration space may be defined to ensure that a global fit maybe determined. According to various methods and systems, a data base ofpossible angle configurations may be searched, in which each angleconfiguration includes three angles. According to various methods andsystems, a data base of possible angle configurations may include foreach angle configuration a probability that the angle configuration mayoccur. For various embodiments of methods and systems for the analysisof genotyping data, preprocessing of the data may be done before theangle configuration search may be performed. Additionally, a qualityscore may be assigned to a genotype call made for a sample, usingvarious embodiments of methods and systems for the analysis ofgenotyping data.

Various embodiments of methods and systems according to the presentteachings may utilize data sets that may be represented according to thegraph depicted in FIG. 3. Such a representation may arise from analysesutilizing two dyes having emissions at different wavelengths, which dyescan be associated with each of a probe directed at one of two alleles ofa diploid genomic locus in a biological sample. In such duplexreactions, a discrete set of signals for each of three possiblegenotypes is produced. In a Cartesian coordinate system of signal 1versus signal 2, as shown in FIG. 3, each data point shown on such agraphic representation may have coordinates in one of three discretesets of signals given, for example in reference to FIG. 3, as (signal 1,signal 1), (signal 1, signal 2), and (signal 2, signal 2). As previouslydescribed, each discrete set of signals for a plurality of samples maybe stored as data points in a data set. Such data sets may be stored ina variety of computer readable media, and analyzed either dynamicallyduring analysis or post analysis, as will be discussed in more detailsubsequently. One such type of assay used to demonstrate the features ofembodiments of methods and systems for the analysis of genotyping datacan utilize TaqMan® reagents, and may use FAM and VIC dye labels.However, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that a varietyof assays including labeling probe reagents may be utilized to producedata that may be analyzed according to various embodiments of methodsand systems of the present teachings.

The term “labeling probe” generally, according to various embodiments,refers to a molecule used in an amplification reaction, typically forquantitative or real-time PCR analysis, as well as end-point analysis.Such labeling probes may be used to monitor the amplification of thetarget polynucleotide. In some embodiments, oligonucleotide probespresent in an amplification reaction are suitable for monitoring theamount of amplicon(s) produced as a function of time. Sucholigonucleotide probes include, but are not limited to, the5′-exonuclease assay TaqMan ® probes described herein (see also U.S.Pat. No. 5,538,848), various stem-loop molecular beacons (see e.g., U.S.Pat. Nos. 6,103,476 and 5,925,517 and Tyagi and Kramer, 1996, NatureBiotechnology 14:303-308), stemless or linear beacons (see, e.g., WO99/21881), PNA Molecular Beacons™ (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,355,421and 6,593,091), linear PNA beacons (see, e.g., Kubista et al., 2001,SPIE 4264:53-58), non-FRET probes (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,150,097),Sunrise®/Amplifluor® probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,548,250), stem-loop andduplex Scorpion™ probes (Solinas et al., 2001, Nucleic Acids Research29:E96 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,743), bulge loop probes (U.S. Pat. No.6,590,091), pseudo knot probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,250), cyclicons(U.S. Pat. No. 6,383,752), MGB Eclipse™ probe (Epoch Biosciences),hairpin probes (U.S. Pat. No. 6,596,490), peptide nucleic acid (PNA)light-up probes, self-assembled nanoparticle probes, andferrocene-modified probes described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No.6,485,901; Mhlanga et al., 2001, Methods 25:463-471; Whitcombe et al.,1999, Nature Biotechnology. 17:804-807; Isacsson et al., 2000, MolecularCell Probes. 14:321-328; Svanvik et al., 2000, Anal Biochem. 281:26-35;Wolffs et al., 2001, Biotechniques 766:769-771; Tsourkas et al., 2002,Nucleic Acids Research. 30:4208-4215; Riccelli et al., 2002, NucleicAcids Research 30:4088-4093; Zhang et al., 2002 Shanghai. 34:329-332;Maxwell et al., 2002, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:9606-9612; Broude et al.,2002, Trends Biotechnol. 20:249-56; Huang et al., 2002, Chem Res.Toxicol. 15:118-126; and Yu et al., 2001, J. Am. Chem. Soc14:11155-11161. Labeling probes can also comprise black hole quenchers(Biosearch), Iowa Black (IDT), QSY quencher (Molecular Probes), andDabsyl and Dabcel sulfonate/carboxylate Quenchers (Epoch). Labelingprobes can also comprise two probes, wherein for example a fluorophoreis on one probe, and a quencher on the other, wherein hybridization ofthe two probes together on a target quenches the signal, or whereinhybridization on target alters the signal signature via a change influorescence. Labeling probes can also comprise sulfonate derivatives offluorescenin dyes with a sulfonic acid group instead of the carboxylategroup, phosphoramidite forms of fluorescein, phosphoramidite forms of CY5 (available for example from Amersham).

As used herein, the term “nucleic acid sample” refers to nucleic acidfound in biological samples according to the present teachings. It iscontemplated that samples may be collected invasively or noninvasively.The sample can be on, in, within, from or found in conjunction with afiber, fabric, cigarette, chewing gum, adhesive material, soil orinanimate objects. “Sample” as used herein, is used in its broadestsense and refers to a sample containing a nucleic acid from which a genetarget or target polynucleotide may be derived. A sample can comprise acell, chromosomes isolated from a cell (e.g., a spread of metaphasechromosomes), genomic DNA, RNA, cDNA and the like. Samples can be ofanimal or vegetable origins encompassing any organism containing nucleicacid, including, but not limited to, plants, livestock, household pets,and human samples, and can be derived from a plurality of sources. Thesesources may include, but are not limited to, whole blood, hair, blood,urine, tissue biopsy, lymph, bone, bone marrow, tooth, amniotic fluid,hair, skin, semen, anal secretions, vaginal secretions, perspiration,saliva, buccal swabs, various environmental samples (for example,agricultural, water, and soil), research samples, purified samples, andlysed cells. It will be appreciated that nucleic acid samples containingtarget polynucleotide sequences can be isolated from samples from usingany of a variety of sample preparation procedures known in the art, forexample, including the use of such procedures as mechanical force,sonication, restriction endonuclease cleavage, or any method known inthe art.

The terms “target polynucleotide,” “gene target”, “target genomic locus”and the like as used herein are used interchangeably herein and refer toa particular nucleic acid sequence of interest. The “target” can be apolynucleotide sequence that is sought to be amplified and can exist inthe presence of other nucleic acid molecules or within a larger nucleicacid molecule. The target polynucleotide can be obtained from anysource, and can comprise any number of different compositionalcomponents. For example, the target can be nucleic acid (e.g. DNA orRNA). The target can be methylated, non-methylated, or both. Further, itwill be appreciated that “target” used in the context of a particularnucleic acid sequence of interest additionally refers to surrogatesthereof, for example amplification products, and native sequences. Insome embodiments, a particular nucleic acid sequence of interest is ashort DNA molecule derived from a degraded source, such as can be foundin, for example, but not limited to, forensics samples. A particularnucleic acid sequence of interest of the present teachings can bederived from any of a number of organisms and sources, as recited above.Regarding the ploidy state of a target genomic locus, for an organismwith a diploid genome, in which two alleles define a locus, that thereare three possible genotypes for such a diploid state. One of ordinaryskill in the art will appreciate that any ploidy state is discretelyassociated with a finite number of allelic combinations defining agenotype classification. Thus, for any ploidy state for any samplehaving a target genomic locus of interest, there are a finite andcalculable number of genotypes.

As used herein, “DNA” refers to deoxyribonucleic acid in its variousforms as understood in the art, such as genomic DNA, cDNA, isolatednucleic acid molecules, vector DNA, and chromosomal DNA. “Nucleic acid”refers to DNA or RNA in any form. Examples of isolated nucleic acidmolecules include, but are not limited to, recombinant DNA moleculescontained in a vector, recombinant DNA molecules maintained in aheterologous host cell, partially or substantially purified nucleic acidmolecules, and synthetic DNA molecules. Typically, an “isolated” nucleicacid is free of sequences which naturally flank the nucleic acid (i.e.,sequences located at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the nucleic acid) in thegenomic DNA of the organism from which the nucleic acid is derived.Moreover, an “isolated” nucleic acid molecule, such as a cDNA molecule,is generally substantially free of other cellular material or culturemedium when produced by recombinant techniques, or free of chemicalprecursors or other chemicals when chemically synthesized.

Various embodiments of methods and systems for the analysis ofgenotyping data according to the present teachings may utilize variousembodiments of a thermal cycler instrument as depicted in the blockdiagrams shown in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5.

According to various embodiments of a thermal cycler instrument 500, asshown in FIG. 4, a thermal cycling instrument may include a heated cover510 that is placed over a plurality of samples 512 contained in a samplesupport device. In various embodiments, a sample support device may be aglass or plastic slide with a plurality of sample regions, which sampleregions have a cover between the sample regions and heated lid 512. Someexamples of a sample support device may include, but are not limited by,a multi-well plate, such as a standard microtiter 96-well, a 384-wellplate, a micro device capable of processing thousands of samples peranalysis, such as microfluidic device, such as a microcard, or a microchip, or any variety of devices fabricated from a substantially planarsupport, such as a glass or plastic slide. The sample regions in variousembodiments of a sample support device may include depressions,indentations, ridges, and combinations thereof, patterned in regular orirregular arrays formed on the surface of the substrate. In variousembodiments of a thermal cycler instrument, include a sample block 514,elements for heating and cooling 516, and a heat exchanger 518. Variousembodiments of a thermal block assembly according to the presentteachings comprise components 514-518 of thermal cycler system 500 ofFIG. 4.

In FIG. 5, various embodiments of a thermal cycling system 600 have thecomponents of embodiments of thermal cycling instrument 500, andadditionally a detection system, providing that real-time for variousembodiment of FIG. 5. In contrast, for various embodiments of a thermalcycler of FIG. 4, detection is done as endpoint, or post-thermal cyclingdetection. A detection system may have an illumination source that emitselectromagnetic energy, and a detector or imager 610, for receivingelectromagnetic energy from samples 616 in sample support device. Forembodiments of thermal cycler instrumentation 500 and 600, a controlsystem 530 and 624, respectively, may be used to control the functionsof the detection, heated cover, and thermal block assembly. The controlsystem may be accessible to an end user through user interface 522 ofthermal cycler instrument 500 and 626 of thermal cycler instrument 600.A computer system 700, as depicted in FIG. 6 may serve as to provide thecontrol the function of a thermal cycler instrument, as well as the userinterface function. Additionally, computer system 700 may provide dataprocessing, display and report preparation functions. All suchinstrument control functions may be dedicated locally to the thermalcycler instrument, or computer system 700 may provide remote control ofpart or all of the control, analysis, and reporting functions, as willbe discussed in more detail subsequently.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram that illustrates a computer system 700 thatmay be employed to carry out processing functionality, according tovarious embodiments, upon which embodiments of a thermal cycler system500 of FIG. 4 or a thermal cycler system 600 of FIG. 5 may utilize.Computing system 700 can include one or more processors, such as aprocessor 704. Processor 704 can be implemented using a general orspecial purpose processing engine such as, for example, amicroprocessor, controller or other control logic. In this example,processor 704 is connected to a bus 702 or other communication medium.

Further, it should be appreciated that a computing system 700 of FIG. 6may be embodied in any of a number of forms, such as a rack-mountedcomputer, mainframe, supercomputer, server, client, a desktop computer,a laptop computer, a tablet computer, hand-held computing device (e.g.,PDA, cell phone, smart phone, palmtop, etc.), cluster grid, netbook,embedded systems, or any other type of special or general purposecomputing device as may be desirable or appropriate for a givenapplication or environment. Additionally, a computing system 700 caninclude a conventional network system including a client/serverenvironment and one or more database servers, or integration withLIS/LIMS infrastructure. A number of conventional network systems,including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), andincluding wireless and/or wired components, are known in the art.Additionally, client/server environments, database servers, and networksare well documented in the art.

Computing system 700 may include bus 702 or other communicationmechanism for communicating information, and processor 704 coupled withbus 702 for processing information.

Computing system 700 also includes a memory 706, which can be a randomaccess memory (RAM) or other dynamic memory, coupled to bus 702 forstoring instructions to be executed by processor 704. Memory 706 alsomay be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediateinformation during execution of instructions to be executed by processor704. Computing system 700 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 708or other static storage device coupled to bus 702 for storing staticinformation and instructions for processor 704.

Computing system 700 may also include a storage device 710, such as amagnetic disk, optical disk, or solid state drive (SSD) is provided andcoupled to bus 702 for storing information and instructions. Storagedevice 710 may include a media drive and a removable storage interface.A media drive may include a drive or other mechanism to support fixed orremovable storage media, such as a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive,a magnetic tape drive, an optical disk drive, a CD or DVD drive (R orRW), flash drive, or other removable or fixed media drive. As theseexamples illustrate, the storage media may include a computer-readablestorage medium having stored therein particular computer software,instructions, or data.

In alternative embodiments, storage device 710 may include other similarinstrumentalities for allowing computer programs or other instructionsor data to be loaded into computing system 700. Such instrumentalitiesmay include, for example, a removable storage unit and an interface,such as a program cartridge and cartridge interface, a removable memory(for example, a flash memory or other removable memory module) andmemory slot, and other removable storage units and interfaces that allowsoftware and data to be transferred from the storage device 710 tocomputing system 700.

Computing system 700 can also include a communications interface 718.Communications interface 718 can be used to allow software and data tobe transferred between computing system 700 and external devices.Examples of communications interface 718 can include a modem, a networkinterface (such as an Ethernet or other NIC card), a communications port(such as for example, a USB port, a RS-232C serial port), a PCMCIA slotand card, Bluetooth, and the like. Software and data transferred viacommunications interface 718 are in the form of signals which can beelectronic, electromagnetic, optical or other signals capable of beingreceived by communications interface 718. These signals may betransmitted and received by communications interface 718 via a channelsuch as a wireless medium, wire or cable, fiber optics, or othercommunications medium. Some examples of a channel include a phone line,a cellular phone link, an RF link, a network interface, a local or widearea network, and other communications channels.

Computing system 700 may be coupled via bus 702 to a display 712, suchas a cathode ray tube (CRT) or liquid crystal display (LCD), fordisplaying information to a computer user. An input device 714,including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 702 forcommunicating information and command selections to processor 704, forexample. An input device may also be a display, such as an LCD display,configured with touch screen input capabilities. Another type of userinput device is cursor control 716, such as a mouse, a trackball orcursor direction keys for communicating direction information andcommand selections to processor 704 and for controlling cursor movementon display 712. This input device typically has two degrees of freedomin two axes, a first axis (e.g., x) and a second axis (e.g., y), thatallows the device to specify positions in a plane. A computing system700 provides data processing and provides a level of confidence for suchdata. Consistent with certain implementations of embodiments of thepresent teachings, data processing and confidence values are provided bycomputing system 700 in response to processor 704 executing one or moresequences of one or more instructions contained in memory 706. Suchinstructions may be read into memory 706 from another computer-readablemedium, such as storage device 710. Execution of the sequences ofinstructions contained in memory 706 causes processor 704 to perform theprocess states described herein. Alternatively hard-wired circuitry maybe used in place of or in combination with software instructions toimplement embodiments of the present teachings. Thus implementations ofembodiments of the present teachings are not limited to any specificcombination of hardware circuitry and software.

The term “computer-readable medium” and “computer program product” asused herein generally refers to any media that is involved in providingone or more sequences or one or more instructions to processor 704 forexecution. Such instructions, generally referred to as “computer programcode” (which may be grouped in the form of computer programs or othergroupings), when executed, enable the computing system 700 to performfeatures or functions of embodiments of the present invention. These andother forms of computer-readable media may take many forms, includingbut not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmissionmedia. Non-volatile media includes, for example, solid state, optical ormagnetic disks, such as storage device 710. Volatile media includesdynamic memory, such as memory 706. Transmission media includes coaxialcables, copper wire, and fiber optics, including the wires that comprisebus 702.

Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppydisk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, or any other magneticmedium, a CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, anyother physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, PROM, and EPROM, aFLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave asdescribed hereinafter, or any other medium from which a computer canread.

Various forms of computer readable media may be involved in carrying oneor more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 704 forexecution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried onmagnetic disk of a remote computer. The remote computer can load theinstructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over atelephone line using a modem. A modem local to computing system 700 canreceive the data on the telephone line and use an infra-red transmitterto convert the data to an infra-red signal. An infra-red detectorcoupled to bus 702 can receive the data carried in the infra-red signaland place the data on bus 702. Bus 702 carries the data to memory 706,from which processor 704 retrieves and executes the instructions. Theinstructions received by memory 706 may optionally be stored on storagedevice 710 either before or after execution by processor 704.

Those skilled in the art will recognize that the operations of thevarious embodiments may be implemented using hardware, software,firmware, or combinations thereof, as appropriate. For example, someprocesses can be carried out using processors or other digital circuitryunder the control of software, firmware, or hard-wired logic. (The term“logic” herein refers to fixed hardware, programmable logic and/or anappropriate combination thereof, as would be recognized by one skilledin the art to carry out the recited functions.) Software and firmwarecan be stored on computer-readable media. Some other processes can beimplemented using analog circuitry, as is well known to one of ordinaryskill in the art. Additionally, memory or other storage, as well ascommunication components, may be employed in embodiments of theinvention.

It will be appreciated that, for clarity purposes, the above descriptionhas described embodiments of the invention with reference to differentfunctional units and processors. However, it will be apparent that anysuitable distribution of functionality between different functionalunits, processors or domains may be used without detracting from theinvention. For example, functionality illustrated to be performed byseparate processors or controllers may be performed by the sameprocessor or controller. Hence, references to specific functional unitsare only to be seen as references to suitable means for providing thedescribed functionality, rather than indicative of a strict logical orphysical structure or organization.

As previously discussed, reference is made to FIG. 3, which displays anidealized plot of data according to various embodiments of the presentteachings. As one of ordinary skill in the art is apprised, for variousembodiments of genotyping assays, a first probe directed to a firstallele of a target diploid genomic locus, designated for exemplificationas allele A, may have a first dye associated with the probe. Similarly,a second probe with a second dye may be directed to a second allele of agenomic locus, designated for exemplification as allele B. Asamplification occurs during thermal cycling, for a biological samplehomozygous in A, a set of signals of the first dye will be reported foreach allele, for homozygous AA. Similarly, for a biological samplehomozygous in B, a set of signals of the second dye will be reported foreach allele of homozygous BB. Finally, for a biological sampleheterozygous, a set of signals of a signal for the first dye and asignal for the second dye will be reported for heterozygous AB.

In that regard, various embodiments of genotyping assays so designedyield a discrete set of signals for each of the three possible alleliccombinations of a target diploid genomic locus, as shown in FIG. 3,which displays three clusters of data points. Regarding step 10, of FIG.1, and in reference to FIG. 3, each data point represents a discrete setof signals detected for a sample in a plurality of biological samplesassayed for a genotype. As previously discussed, each data point shownin FIG. 3 may have coordinates in one of three discrete sets of signalsgiven as (signal 1, signal 1), (signal 1, signal 2), and (signal 2,signal 2). For thermal cycle instruments, such as depicted in FIG. 4,after the samples are cycled to the last cycle, detection may be done asa post endpoint read. For thermal cycle instruments, such as depicted inFIG. 5, detection may occur dynamically in real-time as the samples arecycled to the last cycle and detection may additionally be done as apost endpoint read.

With reference to step 20 of FIG. 1, and as shown in FIG. 3, a baselinefor establishing angles for the each data point may be constructed for aline represented by y=C, where C is a constant, and as shown in FIG. 3,contains a defined origin for the data. The origin (IV), as shown inFIG. 3, is a vertex for each angle, α₁, α₂, and α₃. According to variousembodiments of the present teachings, each data point in each cluster,i, ii, and iii of FIG. 3 may have an angle determined by a lineconstructed using a data point and a defined origin. According tovarious embodiments of the present teachings, the collective set oflines I, II, and III, associated with angles, α₃, α₂, and α₁,respectively, constitute an angle configuration that may be selectedfrom a data base of angle configurations, which will be discussed inmore detail subsequently.

According to various embodiments, an origin may be defined by a negativecontrol. A negative control may be referred to as a non-template control(NTC), which is a sample not containing the target genomic locus ofinterest. For various embodiments of a genotyping assay, the negativecontrol or NTC may contain no oligonucleotide material, and may contain,for example, but not limited by, all the reagents brought to a volumeequal to biological samples being assayed. According to otherembodiments of a genotyping assay, the NTC may contain, for example, butnot limited by, an oligonucleotide sample validated not to contain thesequences of a target genomic locus being assayed. As one of ordinaryskill in the art is apprised, such NTC samples may still produce abackground signal that may be detected. In that regard, one or more NTCsamples may be used to define an origin as well as a baseline from whichthe angles of the samples emitting a discrete set of signals for each ofthree possible allelic can be determined. In various embodiments, aplurality of NTC samples may be used to determine an origin and abaseline thereby. As one of ordinary skill in the art is apprised, theremay be a variety of ways to process the data from a plurality of NTCsamples to determine a value for the origin, including, but not limitedby, the determination of the mean, the median, and the centroid of aplurality of NTC samples.

Alternate embodiments for defining an origin might not involve the usesof NTC samples. For example, the defined origin could be predefinedbased on previously obtained data. Another embodiment could use themorphology of the sample clusters to determine the origin. Yet anotherembodiment could be based on the use fluorescent data collected in earlycycles, which may indicate an acceptable origin for the objective ofdefining an origin. Alternatively, as one of ordinary skill in the artis apprised, a baseline containing a defined origin for y=C, where C isa constant may be arbitrarily defined, based on a user-definedrationale, in which the line contains a user-defined origin for thedata. For example, an origin could be selected as the origin of thegraph as shown in FIG. 3, for which y=0 would provide a baseline.According to various embodiments, for step 20 of FIG. 1, an angle foreach data point in the data set may be determined from a baselineincluding a determined or selected origin.

As depicted in step 30 of FIG. 1, for various embodiments of embodimentsof methods and systems for the analysis of genotyping data of thepresent teachings, an optimal angle configuration search may beperformed. According to various embodiments, an exhaustive search ofangle configuration space may be conducted, in which the data set ofdata points for a plurality of samples can be fit to a best-fit angleconfiguration selected from a data base of angle configurations.

In principle, for K samples undergoing genotyping analysis for a diploidgenome, there are 3^(K) possible genotype assignments, which typicallymay be too many to effectively search every possibility. According tosystems and methods of the present teachings, a data base of angleconfigurations may be generated from which a search for a fit of data ina data set to an optimal angle configuration may be done. In variousembodiments, data sets of genotyping data may be selected as trainingsets for generating a data base of angle configurations. According tovarious embodiments, a data base of angle configurations may include aprobability of a particular angle configuration occurring, which isassociated with each angle configuration in a data base. For variousembodiments of systems and methods according to the present teachings,the probability of a particular angle configuration occurring can beestimated as a function of the frequency of occurrence of the particularangle configuration in a training set. For example, the probability ofan angle configuration occurring can be estimated by evaluating thenumber of times the angle configuration occurs in a training set,divided by the total number of angle configurations in the training set.

Such data sets of genotyping data may be selected for having attributesrepresenting genotyping data that may be analyzed using variousembodiments of systems and methods for genotyping by angleconfiguration. Data sets used as training sets for generating a database of angle configurations may have attributes derived from variablesimpacting such data sets, such as, but not limited by, the type ofsample analyzed (i.e. a certain cell, tissue, or biological fluid type),the sample preparation method, assay conditions (i.e. probe, reporter,reagents and matrix), and instrumentation (i.e. detector, thermal blockassembly, and sample block). Accordingly, training sets of data used togenerate a data base of angle configurations may be selected toespecially reflect the type of data being analyzed. In variousembodiments, the angle configuration space may be defined by a user.

For example, various embodiments of the present teachings may utilize adata set of more than 100,000 genotyping assays that was selected forattributes for performing genotyping analysis as the basis forgenerating a data base of angle configurations from which the search fora fit of data in a data set to an optimal angle configuration may bedone. Such a training set may be used to define the angle space fromwhich a data base of angle configurations could be generated. Forvarious embodiments of systems and methods of the present teachings, anangle configuration space may be defined in order to provide exhaustivesearching to ensure, with an associated confidence, that a global fit ofthe samples to an angle configuration may be found. For example, insteadof searching 3^(K) possible genotype assignments, using a selectedtraining set of more than 100,000 genotyping assays in variousembodiments, angle configuration space according to various embodimentsof systems and methods of the present teachings was defined as:

-   -   α₁ can vary between −47.5° and 92.5°    -   α₂ can vary between −47.5° and 137.5°    -   α₃ can vary between −2.5° and 137.5°    -   Angle spacing for each angle is 5°    -   Angles are in increasing order α₁<α₂<α₃

Using the above boundary conditions derived from a training set ofgenotyping data having targeted attributes, a data base of angleconfigurations having an overall number of 3797 unique angleconfigurations can be generated. Additionally, for various embodimentsof systems and methods of the present teachings, each unique angleconfiguration in a data base can be associated with a probability thatthe angle configuration may occur.

Various embodiments of a data base utilized in, for example, but notlimited by, step 30 of FIG. 1, may vary according to how the angleconfiguration space may be defined by the selection of a training set ofdata. Accordingly, the number of angle configurations in a data base maybe larger or smaller than 3797, depending on the selection of a trainingset. For example, the selection of a training set may impact how theranges of the angles could be defined to create either more or lesspossible angle configurations than the 3797 unique angle configurationsin the above example. The selection of a training set could alter theangle spacing to be more or less than 5°, which may also impact thenumber of angle configurations for various embodiments of an angleconfiguration data base. Additionally, the selection of a training setmay impact the evaluation of a probability of any one angleconfiguration occurring in various embodiments of an angle configurationdata base.

Regarding the selection of a training set, it may be desired to limitthe data set to have a limited set of attributes derived from variablesimpacting such data sets so as to improve accuracy of the algorithm forthose characteristics. For example, it may be desirable to select a dataset from a single assay type to ensure the algorithm is optimized forthat assay. For various embodiments of systems and method according tothe present teachings, a unique set of angle configurations generatedempirically from training sets can be stored in a data base. Such a database can be designed to remain static (i.e. unchanged) for use withsystem and methods according to the present teachings, or may designedto be dynamically changing, and continually updated. According tovarious embodiments, a data base may be updated by an end user directly,or through an automated process. In various embodiments, new angleconfigurations can be added to a data base as a training set is updatedwith new data. For example, an angle configuration data base can beupdated as more samples are run for the particular assay and added to atraining set. In this regard, by the selection of a training set ofdata, various embodiments of an angle configuration data base may begenerated, and may be uniquely created for use in evaluation of targetedassays and data sets.

In FIGS. 7A-7C, three possible angle configurations according to variousembodiments of an angle configuration data base are shown graphically,to assist in an understanding of various embodiments of conducting anoptimal angle configuration search, as indicated in step 30 of FIG. 1.As indicated aside each figure, the three angles, and angle spacing foreach exemplary angle configuration shown are consistent with variousembodiments of an angle configuration data base, as given in aboveexample. Though the angles are listed in degrees, as one of ordinaryskill in the art would recognize, any form of angle representation maybe used, such as radians or polar coordinates. In FIGS. 7A-7C, everyexemplary angle of three discrete angles is listed in degrees, with anangle spacing of 5°, so that each angle configuration covers a uniqueportion of a defined angle configuration space.

FIGS. 8A and 8B, and FIGS. 9A and 9B depict various embodiments ofmethods and systems for the analysis of genotyping data of the presentteachings, as indicated in steps 10-30 of FIG. 1. In FIG. 8A, a data setof data points for a plurality of biological samples for a genotypingassay is depicted, as displayed as clusters i,ii, and iii in FIG. 8A.Additionally, a cluster iv is shown in FIG. 8A, which cluster may beused to determine a defined origin. As previously discussed, such acluster may be a data set of data points from a non-template control(NTC) set of samples. In various embodiments of the present teachings,angles can be determined for each sample data point, where vertex IV foreach angle, for example, but not limited by, as shown in FIGS. 8B and8C, as well as FIGS. 9B and 9C, is a defined origin. In an iterativeprocess, every sample may be assessed against a fit to an angleconfiguration in a data base, such as an angle configuration graphicallydisplayed in FIG. 8B. As can be seen in FIG. 8C, the central lines I,II, and III of the angle configuration of FIG. 8B, appears to be areasonable fit to the data. In contrast, in comparison to FIGS. 9A-9C,the angle configuration from the data base, as depicted in FIG. 9B, isnot a good fit to the data of FIG. 9A, as is evident from inspection ofFIG. 9C. As will be discussed in more detail subsequently, for variousembodiments of methods and systems of the present teachings, a fit scoreincluding a term for the sum of the fit of all data points to an angleconfiguration in a data base may be calculated, and may be used toassess the fit of the data to an angle configuration in a data base.

The graphic depiction of various embodiments of method 100 of FIG. 1 isgiven in FIGS. 10A-100 and FIGS. 11A-110. With each figure, a fit scoreis listed, wherein the fit score is defined as:

L _(i) =ΣL _(i,k) +L _(i,a priori) +L _(i,Hardy Weinberg)

where:

-   -   L_(i) is a total fit score for an angle configuration in an        angle configuration data base.    -   ΣL_(i,k) is a term in the total fit score that is a fit sum for        all data points in a data set to an angle configuration in a        data base.    -   L_(i,a priori) is a term in the total fit score related to the        probability that an angle configuration may occur and may be        provided as information in an angle configuration data base.    -   L_(i,Hardy Weinberg) is a term in the total fit score related to        a fit of the data to a Hardy-Weinberg distribution.

According to various embodiments of methods and systems of the presentteachings, the highest score for an angle configuration may be used todefine a best-fit angle configuration. In various embodiments of systemsand methods of the present teachings, additional terms beyond the termsgenerated using information in an angle configuration data base may beadded to the fit score. For various embodiments, additional terms mayutilize information, for example, but not limited by, the agreement offit of an angle configuration with positive controls, with a specifiedallele frequency, and with a Hardy-Weinberg distribution as additionalcriteria of fit of an angle configuration to a data set. Any number ofpositive controls can be used. In some cases it may be beneficial tohave one or more positive controls for one or more of the clusters.Furthermore, it may be desired to bias the fit score dynamically basedon the type of positive control which would include but not be limitedto synthetic positive controls and biological positive controls.Positive controls are typically data for which the genotype is known.However, this need not be the case. A positive control can be anon-biological fluorescent marker which still can be used to calculatethe expected location of a cluster.

In one embodiment, the fit of data associated with sample “k” to angleconfiguration “i”, L_(i,k), is the logarithm of the probability of theangle of the data for sample “k” arising in an assay with true angleconfiguration “i”. For example, this probability can be modeled as amixture of normal distributions around the genotype angles comprisingthe angle configuration “i”. In various embodiments, L_(i,a priori) is alogarithmic expression of the probability for angle configuration “i”.Such a probability may be associated with each angle configuration in adata base, as previously described. According to various embodiments ofthe present teachings, L_(i,Hardy Weinberg) may be derived through athree step procedure. In a first step, a conditional genotype call canbe assigned to each data point, by assuming that angle configuration “i”is a correct angle configuration. In a second step, frequencies of thethree genotypes and the two alleles are calculated from the conditionalgenotype calls. Finally, in a third step, L_(i,Hardy Weinberg) may becalculated as the logarithm of the p-value for the Pearson's chi-squaretest for fit of the distribution, which compares the observedfrequencies of the three genotypes to Hardy-Weinberg genotypefrequencies expected for a population with the observed allelefrequencies.

FIGS. 10A-100 and FIGS. 11A-110 depict examples of a fit of threedifferent angle configurations to two different data sets of data pointsfor a plurality of biological samples, according to various embodimentsof methods 100 and 200 of the present teachings. In FIGS. 10A-100, thegraphic fit of the central angles of an angle configuration from a database to the same data set is displayed, and an overall fit score isshown, along with the values of every term of the overall score. At aglance, the three angle configurations appear to be a reasonable fit, incontrast, for example, to the fit shown in FIG. 9C. It is apparent thatwith the Hardy-Weinberg fit score, that the angle configuration in FIG.10B would be selected with the highest fit score. For this data set theangle configuration of FIG. 10B was validated as a correct fit to thedata set. However, without that additional Hardy-Weinberg term, theangle configuration of FIG. 10A would have the highest score. FIGS.11A-11C depict the fit of three different angle configurations to a dataset of data points for a plurality of biological samples where there isonly one cluster of data points in a data set. For the data setrepresented in this figure set, FIG. 11B was validated as a correct fitto the data set, which has the highest fit score.

As shown in step 40 of FIG. 1, an assignment of a final genotypeclassification to each sample in the plurality of sample may be done.According to various embodiments of methods and systems of the presentteachings, the assignment of a genotype for each data pointcorresponding to each sample may be done, as each angle of the best-fitangle configuration may be discretely associated with one of the threepossible allelic combinations defining a genotype classification. Forexample, in FIG. 3, a data point associated with angle α₃ is in turnassociated with a genotype homogeneous for the allele detected by thelabeling probe of signal 1.

Regarding FIG. 1, step 50, as previously discussed, and as one ofordinary skill in the art may readily recognize, there are various waysof outputting genotyping information; for example, but not limited bygenotyping data, final genotyping assignments, and genotyping qualityscores, to an end user in numerous formats using numerous devices. Forexample, with respect to format of genotyping information, the data maybe presented in a graphical format, as a written report, or combinationsthereof. With respect to output devices, genotyping information may beoutput to devices such as, but not limited by a printer, a cathode raytube (CRT) display, a liquid crystal display (LCD), and a light-emittingdiode (LED) display.

As depicted in FIG. 2 for method 200, steps 110-130, according tovarious embodiments of methods and systems for the analysis ofgenotyping data of the present teachings, preprocessing of the data maybe done. In various embodiments, the preprocessing may be done beforethe determination of an angle for every data point in a data set.

According to various embodiments, as indicated in step 110 of method200, outliers may be identified, and indicated as invalid. Recalling, inview of FIG. 3, every sample amplified using a first probe having afirst signal and a second probe having a second signal may be plotted ina Cartesian coordinate system of signal 1 versus signal 2. In thatregard, valid samples may have coordinates in 1 of three sets; (signal1, signal 1), (signal 1, signal 2), or (signal 2, signal 2). For variousembodiments, an outlier may be identified according to havingcoordinates that may deviate from one of the three expected sets. Forexample, but not limited by, in various embodiments, an outlier may beidentified as invalid if it has essentially no signal for onecoordinate. For various embodiments, an outlier may be called if theintensity of a sample is off scale for a detector reading. Yet anotherembodiment would be to define an outlier if the data point falls in anarea not defined by an angle configuration. In various embodiments, thisarea could be based on calculated probabilities that a sample belongs toa genotype or alternatively could be calculated based on the Euclideanor Manhattan distance from the cluster centroids. Another embodimentallows multiple zones in the Cartesian coordinate system to be definearbitrarily which would be used to determine if a sample is an outlier.A radial zone centered at the origin and bounded by an inner radius andouter radius such that the inner and outer radius are between thegenotype clusters and NTC cluster would be an example. Here the innerand outer radius could be calculated by, but not limited to, usingprobabilities or as mentioned before, defined arbitrarily.

As previously discussed, an angle may be determined for a data point inreference to a baseline. For various embodiments, a baseline may bedetermined using a non-template control (NTC), which are a negativesample control. According to various embodiments, as indicated in step120 of method 200, shown in FIG. 2, for various embodiments of methodsand systems of the present teachings, preprocessing the data wouldinclude a step of identifying the negative control samples. According tovarious embodiments, such negative controls may be designated as part ofthe assay set-up, and the information regarding the identity of negativesamples may be stored in an accessible computer-readable location. Forvarious embodiments, the NTC cluster may be identified, and a centroidof the cluster identified, which centroid may define an origin andbaseline.

According to various embodiments as indicated in step 130 of method 200,a sample for which PCR has been inhibited may not have an appreciablesignal amplitude, and may be fall within or near a NTC cluster.Accordingly, for various embodiments of step 130 of method 200, once thenegative control cluster has been identified, biological samples forwhich amplification failed to occur may be identified accordingly.Additionally, for various embodiments, after step 120 of method 200 hasbeen completed, it may be possible to identify invalid negativecontrols. For example, a negative control is not anticipated to have anappreciable signal amplitude. In various embodiments, all samplesinputted as negative control having a signal amplitude greater than adefined signal amplitude may be defined as outlier NTCs, and identifiedas invalid. In the regard, one of ordinary skill in the art wouldrecognize that the step of identifying outliers may occur according towhen and how information about other samples is inputted. Therefore, forvarious embodiments, step 110 may reoccur as a preprocessing step.

For various embodiments of methods and systems for the analysis ofgenotyping data of the present teachings, a quality value may beassigned for every final genotype call assigned to every sample. Aquality value may convey to an end user information about the likelihoodthat a correct genotype has been assigned to a given sample. As such, aquality value may be used as additional information for an end user toevaluate a genotype assignment for a sample. As one of ordinary skill inthe art of genotyping analysis is apprised, a quality value could beexpressed in probability scale, in percent, in phred scale, or any otherunit.

According to various embodiments of systems and methods of the presentteachings, a quality value for sample “k” can be obtained by firstgenerating three genotype scores (S_(1,k), S_(2,k), S_(3,k)), one foreach of the three possible genotypes. Each score is a measure of thelikelihood that the sample “k” may be that genotype. For variousembodiments, a quality value in probability scale can be calculatedaccording to formula:

QV _(k)=max(S _(1,k) , S _(2,k) , S _(3,k))/(S _(1,k) +S _(2,k) +S_(3,k))

In various embodiments, the genotype score S_(1,k) comprises amodel-based probability that a typical sample with genotype 1 could havea signal angle equal to that observed for sample “k”. It can alsocomprise a model-based probability that a typical sample with genotype 1could have a signal magnitude equal to that observed for sample “k”.Common probabilistic models for typical sample angles and magnitudesinclude normal distribution for sample angles (centered around the anglefrom the best angle configuration associated with genotype 1); normal orlog-normal distribution for sample magnitudes. It is standard toestimate the missing parameters of these distributions from the samplesignals and their assigned genotypes.

Alternatively, a quality value for a sample may be obtained from thedistance from the cluster centroid or metrics derived from the clustermorphology. Furthermore, metrics such as the number of sigma separationsbetween clusters can be used in obtaining a quality value.

While the principles of various embodiments of methods and systems forthe analysis of genotyping data have been described in connection withspecific embodiments, it should be understood clearly that thesedescriptions are made only by way of example and are not intended tolimit the scope of the invention. What has been disclosed herein hasbeen provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It isnot intended to be exhaustive or to limit what is disclosed to theprecise forms described. Many modifications and variations will beapparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. What is disclosed waschosen and described in order to best explain the principles andpractical application of the disclosed embodiments of the art described,thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the variousembodiments and various modifications that are suited to the particularuse contemplated. It is intended that the scope of what is disclosed bedefined by the following claims and their equivalence.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-readable medium encoded withinstructions, executable by a processor, for determining a genotype fora genomic locus in a biological sample, the instructions comprisinginstructions for: receiving a data set for a genotyping assay, whereinthe data set comprises a data point for each sample in a plurality ofbiological samples; determining an angle for each data point in the dataset, wherein a vertex for each angle contains a defined origin;performing an optimal angle configuration search for the data set; saidoptimal angle configuration search comprising a best fit of the anglesdetermined for each data point in the data set to an angle configurationin a plurality of angle configurations in a data base; and assigning afinal genotype classification to each sample in the plurality ofbiological samples based on the fit of the data set to a best-fit angleconfiguration, wherein each angle of the best-fit angle configuration isdiscretely associated with a finite number of allelic combinationsdefining a genotype classification.
 2. The computer-readable medium ofclaim 1, wherein the optimal angle configuration search comprising abest fit of the plurality of angles is expressed as a term in a fitscore used to evaluate the best fit for the data set.
 3. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 2, wherein the fit score used toevaluate the best fit for the data set further comprises a term for anassigned probability of occurrence for each angle configuration in thedata base of angle configurations.
 4. The computer-readable-medium ofclaim 3, wherein the term uses a logarithmic expression of the assignedprobability.
 5. The computer-readable medium of claim 2, wherein the fitscore used to evaluate the best fit for the data set further comprises aterm for a Hardy-Weinberg allele frequency.
 6. The computer-readablemedium of claim 1, wherein an identified baseline is a line containingthe defined origin.
 7. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherethe origin is defined by a non-template control sample.
 8. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein each angle configuration inthe data base comprises three angles.
 9. The computer-readable medium ofclaim 1, wherein the definable number of allelic combinations is threefor a diploid organism.
 10. The computer-readable medium of claim 1,wherein the data base of angle configurations is empirically derivedfrom a data base of genotyping data.
 11. The computer-readable medium ofclaim 10, wherein the data base of genotyping data is selected forinherent attributes relating to how genotyping data is generated. 12.The computer-readable medium of claim 1, further comprising a step ofpreprocessing the data.
 13. The computer-readable medium of claim 12,wherein preprocessing the data comprises identifying outliers.
 14. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 12, wherein preprocessing the datacomprises identifying negative sample controls.
 15. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 12, wherein preprocessing the datacomprises identifying non-amplified samples.
 16. The computer-readablemedium of claim 1, further comprising a step of assigning a qualityvalue to the final genotype classification of each sample.
 17. Acomputer implemented method for determining a genotype for a genomiclocus in a biological sample, the method comprising: receiving a dataset for a genotyping assay, wherein the data set comprises a data pointfor each sample in a plurality of biological samples; processing thedata set on a computer to determine the genotype for each sample in abiological, the processing comprising: determining an angle for eachdata point in the data set, wherein a vertex for each angle contains adefined origin; performing an optimal angle configuration search for thedata set; said optimal angle configuration search comprising a best fitof the angles determined for each data point in the data set to an angleconfiguration in a plurality of angle configurations in a data base; andassigning a final genotype classification to each sample in theplurality of biological samples based on the fit of the data set to thebest-fit angle configuration, wherein each angle of the best-fit angleconfiguration is discretely associated with a finite number of alleliccombinations defining a genotype classification.
 18. The method of claim17, further comprising a step of preprocessing the data.
 19. The methodof claim 17, further comprising a step of assigning a quality value tothe final genotype classification of each sample.
 20. The method ofclaim 17, wherein the optimal angle configuration search comprising abest fit of the plurality of angles is expressed as a term in a fitscore used to evaluate the best fit for the data set.
 21. The method ofclaim 20, wherein the fit score used to evaluate the best fit for thedata set further comprises a term for an assigned probability ofoccurrence for each angle configuration in the data base of angleconfigurations.
 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the fit score usedto evaluate the best fit for the data set further comprises a term for aHardy-Weinberg allele frequency.
 23. A system comprising: a processor;and a memory in communication with the processor; the memory storinginstructions for: receiving by a processor a data set for a genotypingassay, wherein the data set comprises a data point for each sample in aplurality of biological samples; determining an angle for each datapoint in the data set, wherein a vertex for each angle contains adefined origin; performing an optimal angle configuration search for thedata set; said optimal angle configuration search comprising a best fitof the angles determined for each data point in the data set to an angleconfiguration in a plurality of angle configurations in a data base; andassigning a final genotype classification to each sample in theplurality of biological samples based on the fit of the data set to abest-fit angle configuration, wherein each angle of the best-fit angleconfiguration is discretely associated with a finite number of possibleallelic combinations defining a genotype classification.
 24. A computersystem comprising: a data base having: records containing informationidentifying a plurality of angle configurations of signal data forgenotyping assays, wherein the angle configurations are generated tocover a defined angle configuration space; and a user interface allowinga user to selectively access the information contained in the records.25. The computer system of claim 24, wherein the data base furthercomprises records containing information identifying for each angleconfiguration record a probability that the angle configuration mayoccur.